|Advertising|Jobs 転職|Shukan ST|JT Weekly|Book Club|JT Women|Study in Japan|Times Coupon|Subscribe 新聞購読申込|
|Home > News|
Tuesday, April 19, 2005
OFFENSIVE POSTURE SEEN SERVING JAPAN LEAST
Director hits moves to revise Constitution
By ERIKO ARITA
If Japan revises the Constitution's war-renouncing Article 9 and officially designates its military as such, other parts of Asia will increase their arms buildups and war will become a possibility, according to American film director John Junkerman.
The Tokyo-based director, who recently completed the documentary "Japan's Peace Constitution," said in an interview that Article 9 has kept Japan from resorting to use of force and reassured other parts of Asia that the country does not pose an aggressive threat.
"But if Article 9 is revised and the Self-Defense Forces are called (a) military and given that right of being engaged in collective . . . defense, Japan's neighbors are going to say 'there is nothing anymore that constrains Japan, so therefore we have to rebuild up our arms as well,' " Junkerman said.
On Tokyo's disputes over South Korea-controlled islets known by Japan as Takeshima, and the Japan-controlled Senkaku islets, which are claimed by China and Taiwan, he said, "They could very easily escalate into increased tensions and to wars."
Junkerman's film tells how the constitutional revision is an international issue, not a domestic one, through views of 12 intellectuals from Japan and overseas, including China, South Korea and the U.S.
Chalmers Johnson, director of the Japan Policy Research Institute in San Diego, said Japan apologized for its aggression in East Asia by renouncing the use of force via Article 9.
"To formally renounce Article 9 is to renounce the apology," he said in the film.
The film also shows testimony from South Korean women who were forced into sexual slavery for the Japanese Imperial Army, and their protest in front of the Japanese Embassy in Seoul, where they demanded that Tokyo apologize and stop its alleged militarization.
To discuss the Constitution, Junkerman noted it is indispensable to look at the history of Japan's aggression in Asia. He said one of the reasons for making the film was to educate Japanese youth, who are less aware of what happened.
The film traces the process of establishing the Constitution from 1945 to 1947 through interviews with John Dower, an expert on Japan's postwar history and a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and former University of Tokyo professor Rokuro Hidaka.
Although the Liberal Democratic Party claims the Constitution was drawn up by the U.S. and Japan should make its own, the experts argued that citizens' groups and political parties debated the Constitution and the General Headquarters of the Allied Forces incorporated their proposals in its draft.
Junkerman said he learned of Japan's war-renouncing Constitution when he visited the country in 1969. Amid the Vietnam War, the Constitution appeared to him as an enlightened document that shows how things ought to be in the future.
But amending the Constitution has been the topic of debate for decades, partly due to U.S. pressure for Japan to play a greater security role during the Cold War.
"I think the U.S is largely responsible for the pressure on Japan now to change the Constitution. So as a U.S. citizen, I see my responsibility to do what I can to counter that pressure from the United State," he said.
Earlier this month, the LDP unveiled an outline of its planned amendment that proclaims the SDF a military tasked with defending Japan. Although the outline does not stipulate that Japan would exercise its right to collective defense, some LDP lawmakers proposed stipulating that right in laws to be enacted.
Junkerman worries over what he feels is the LDP's desire to clear the way for the SDF to engage in offensive action without constraint, such as what he perceives the U.S. to be doing in Iraq. SDF troops are currently in Iraq on a humanitarian mission and are only allowed to use their weapons if fired on.
"It was a war that had no justification whatsoever. Iraq had not attacked the United States and certainly it had not attacked Japan," said Junkerman, criticizing Japan's support for the war and its perceived intent to join in such armed conflict.
LDP lawmakers claim Japan should have a military in name and make active efforts to help keep the peace in the international community. But Junkerman feels Japan can contribute to the world in a different way.
In a scene in his documentary, a shop owner in Syria says Japan suffered the most from wars and he imagines the Japanese don't want to send the SDF overseas.
The image of Japan as a peaceful nation is common in the world, Junkerman claimed, adding Japan should take an aggressive role in seeking peaceful solutions to conflicts.
"This is the ironic thing -- that there is no doubt that many Japanese feel a lack of pride about Japan's role in the world. And the simple solution to that in many people's minds is to have a strong military," he said. "But . . . the Japanese people could have pride in their government as being a leader in the world in bringing about peaceful and constructive solutions to international problems."
Half of the interviews in the film are in English; non-English ones do not include English subtitles. The documentary will be previewed Saturday at Nakano Zero in Tokyo and May 28 at Chuo Kumin Hall in Osaka. It will screen at a theater in Tokyo in August and in Osaka in July. For more information, call Siglo at (03) 5343-3101.